Skip to content

Scope, conventions & assumptions

The rules the rest of the site relies on — scope, vocabulary, data, perspectives, contract and metric conventions, demo-scale limits — each stated in one line with a pointer to the section that defines it.

This page is an index of the site’s operating assumptions. Every entry is a one-line statement of a convention and a pointer to the section where it is defined. That section is the authoritative statement: it carries the reasoning and the escape hatch for readers whose organisation chose differently, and it is the one that changes if the convention ever does. Nothing here is new. A reader using the site as a reference can collect the rules from this page instead of reconstructing them from five chapters.

Where a page or glossary entry adopts one side of a usage the market leaves open — or departs from market usage outright — it says so with the label This site’s convention: — that exact string, so it can be searched for. The label sits at the canonical statement and on the glossary entry; the rows below that open with it are the ones where market usage differs.

ConventionRuleStated in
ScopeProperty-catastrophe reinsurance, after the model has run. Every calculation starts from the catastrophe model’s trial-based loss output and works downstream: contracts, portfolios, pricing, capital.Home
ExclusionsCatastrophe-model internals, exposure and experience rating, reserving and IBNR, and casualty, specialty, life, and health reinsurance are out of scope by design. The boundary is stated, not apologised for.Home
Loss side onlyA handful of operations on trial losses expresses the loss side of every standard property-cat treaty structure — and claims nothing about the premium side. Commissions, reinstatement premiums, and profit commissions are named where they arise and not modelled.Financial Modelling · Quota share · CatXoL
RetrocessionFollowed one step: the reinsurer’s own portfolio loss is a retro contract’s subject loss and the same terms apply. Designing an outward program is out of scope.Products and contracts
ApplicationsAPI-only: inputs, transformations, outputs — no user interface, deployment, data engineering, or regulatory capital regime.Applications
ConventionRuleStated in
TrialNot a year. A trial is one independent simulated realisation of a period — typically a year, not necessarily. The “Y” in YELT and YLT is the industry’s name, inherited rather than endorsed.The trial worldview · Glossary
Event and occurrenceTwo objects. The event is the catalog prototype; the occurrence is its dated instance in a trial, keyed (trial_id, timestamp, event_id). Every YELT row is an occurrence.The trial worldview
ScenarioReserved for a deliberately chosen what-if state. Never a synonym for trial.Glossary
ContractThe default noun for any reinsurance agreement. Treaty, layer, and program keep their specific senses; a program is the set of protections a cedent buys, never a composition.Products and contracts · Glossary
Subject and coveredSubject is the contract’s input; covered is the filtered, in-period slice. “Subject” is never used for the post-filter stream.Financial perspectives · Glossary
Retained and retentionThis site’s convention: both name the cedent’s side. The reinsurer’s post-recovery position is its net loss, never its “retained loss”.Products and contracts · Glossary
CompositionThe noun and the act. A contract is a composition of financial terms, written C=TkT1C = T_k \circ \cdots \circ T_1 and read right to left — T1T_1 applies first. “Pipeline” is the informal name for the data flow.Contracts as compositions
Inuring and sourcingTwo of the three relationships between layers; top & drop is the third. Inuring subtracts one layer’s recoveries from another’s subject — the lower contract inures to the benefit of the higher. Sourcing makes one layer’s gross another’s subject; the pairing of the names is Verisk’s, adopted here.Programs · Glossary
ConventionRuleStated in
TrialsEquiprobable and independent: each of NN trials carries probability 1/N1/N, and one trial’s outcome says nothing about another’s. Every cedent’s YELT shares one trial index, so losses add within a trial across cedents.The trial worldview · Portfolio analytics
YELT schemaA four-column industry core — trial_id, timestamp, event_id, loss — and a five-column enrichment specific to this site — peril, geography_id, lob_id, cedent_id, tiv — one workable design, not a standard.The trial worldview · Glossary
Primary key(trial_id, timestamp, event_id, cedent_id, geography_id, lob_id). event_id names a prototype, so timestamp is part of the key, and one occurrence can span several rows.The trial worldview
Sign conventionThis site’s convention: loss-positive. loss and tiv are strictly positive in a base YELT and non-negative in a transformed one; a negative loss anywhere is a validation error, and other financial record types are a schema extension, never a sign flip.The trial worldview · escape hatch: Metrics · Glossary
UnitsMillions of US dollars, one currency. Losses add directly across cedents; currency conversion is treated as outside the analytics.The trial worldview · Portfolio analytics
YELT in, YELT outEvery financial term consumes and produces a YELT at occurrence resolution; the aggregate excess conforms by erosion attribution. A YLT is a chosen, lossy reduction — no term outputs one.The trial worldview · Portfolios · Glossary
RoundingComputed unrounded, displayed rounded: one decimal for losses (two in the Trial 9 split tables), two for capital and premium. Components and totals are rounded separately, so displayed parts can miss a displayed total in the last place.Helios Re
Demo tierEvery worked example runs on the 20-trial demo tier: the mechanics are exact, the levels are not. The phrase “20-trial demo tier” is the standing marker.The trial worldview · Helios Re
ConventionRuleStated in
Point of viewThe reinsurer’s, unless stated otherwise. Subject is what the cedent’s book presents; gross is what the reinsurer assumes; recoveries are what it retrocedes; net is gross minus recoveries.Products and contracts · Glossary
Loss perspectivesFive perspectives on one set of dollars: subject, covered, gross, cedent retained, net. Expected loss splits exactly across them; tail risk does not — a residual tail is a Co-TVaR, not a difference of TVaRs.Financial perspectives
NetGross is net until an outward protection exists. Net needs a second contract; a single contract’s four perspectives are the whole story.Financial perspectives
Coverage basisLosses occurring, throughout. An occurrence belongs to a contract when its event date falls inside the period; risks attaching and underwriting year need a policy inception date no YELT row carries.Contract period · Glossary
ConventionRuleStated in
Contracts at 100%A composition never carries the participation share. Participation is a scaling applied at portfolio roll-up, and standalone contract metrics are reported at 100%.Contracts as compositions
Occurrence definitionThe YELT’s event_id grouping. The treaty’s hours clause is assumed to coincide with the model’s event boundaries; the occurrence definition as a term of its own is out of scope.Occurrence excess · Glossary
ReinstatementsEncoded as the aggregate limit (1+n)(1+n)\,\ell — a claims-side encoding that reproduces the recoveries and drops the reinstatement premium.CatXoL
Erosion attributionClaims order. The aggregate excess books each occurrence’s contribution to the aggregate gross chronologically; proportional attribution is a recognised variant the site does not use.Aggregate excess · Glossary
Event limitThis site’s convention: the cap sits on the subject occurrence. Wordings normally cap the ceded side; a ceded-side limit \ell is the subject-side e=/q\ell_e = \ell / q.Quota share · Glossary
Contract periodStays inside the trial year. Windows that cross a year boundary, multi-year covers, and anniversary resets are out of scope.Contract period
InuringActs between two contracts’ outputs, not inside a composition. It takes the inuring contract’s gross loss out of the beneficiary’s subject loss before the beneficiary’s own terms run.Contracts as compositions · Programs
ConventionRuleStated in
EP curveP(Lx)P(L \geq x), with \geq, so the rr-th largest of NN equiprobable trials has exceedance probability r/Nr/N; the return period is its reciprocal.Distribution semantics
VaR and TVaRVaR is always an observed trial loss — the kk-th largest with k=(1α)Nk = \lfloor (1-\alpha)\,N \rfloor, never interpolated. When k=0k = 0 the quote does not exist and the code returns NaN. TVaR averages the worst kk and inherits both conventions.Metrics: VaR · TVaR
Attachment and exhaustionAttachment is strict (L>AL > A); exhaustion is not (LA+L \geq A + \ell). Both conditions describe the recovery, not the EP curve’s rank convention. The basis — trial total or occurrence — follows the contract.Metrics · Metrics
CapitalThis site’s convention: the unexpected loss, K=TVaRαELK = \text{TVaR}_\alpha - \text{EL} at α=90%\alpha = 90\% — one economic-capital convention, not a regulatory one.Standalone program pricing · Glossary
Technical premiumEL+ϵEL+Krc\text{EL} + \epsilon\,\text{EL} + K\,r_c with ϵ=5%\epsilon = 5\% and rc=10%r_c = 10\% — an illustrative decomposition chosen for this site. Brokerage, taxes, uncertainty loads, and the market cycle are left out.Standalone program pricing · Glossary
Loss ratioThis site’s convention: modelled expected loss over premium — an ex ante figure, where market practice reserves the term for realised incurred over earned.Glossary
Rate on line and RAROCRate on line is premium over limit; RAROC is (premiumELϵEL)/K(\text{premium} - \text{EL} - \epsilon\,\text{EL}) / K. Every premium-derived ratio on the site is a demonstration of method at demo scale, not a market benchmark.Glossary · Glossary · Portfolio analytics · Helios Re
Premium figures100% layer figures for the six modelled contracts — $90M against a company-wide ~$250M. Helios Re books its participation share of each.Helios Re

If an entry here and its source section ever disagree, the source section is right and this page is out of date. The glossary carries the definitions the conventions rest on; the Helios Re appendix carries the data and contracts every number traces to.